Brian R. Belland

  • Professor of Education (Educational Psychology), The Pennsylvania State University

[email protected]

scholar.google.com/citations?user=p_rEK34AAAAJ

orcid.org/0000-0002-8925-9152

Impact Metrics
3,315
Total Citations
7
PR Journals
26
h-index
44
i10-index
0
Top Conf
1
Other Works
Awards & Honors
Outstanding Research Paper Award (Design and Technology SIG)

American Educational Research Association

2021
Outstanding Empirical Journal Article Award (Research & Theory Division)

Association for Educational Communications and Technology (AECT)

2018
Outstanding Journal Article Award (Research & Theory Division)

Association for Educational Communications and Technology (AECT)

2017
Researcher of the Year

Department of Instructional Technology and Learning Sciences, Utah State University

2014
Crystal Award – Quantitative Focused Article (Division of Distance Learning)

Association for Educational Communications and Technology (AECT)

2014
NSF CAREER Award

National Science Foundation

2010
Best Paper Award (Instructional Technology SIG)

American Educational Research Association

2009
Educational Technology Research and Development Young Scholar Award

ETR&D (AECT Research Section Editorial Board)

2007
Best Student Paper Award (Problem‑Based Education SIG)

American Educational Research Association

2007
Frank B. DeBruicker Graduate Award

Educational Technology Program, Purdue University

2007
Past Positions

Associate Professor of Education (Educational Psychology), The Pennsylvania State University

2018–2024

Associate Professor, Department of Instructional Technology and Learning Sciences, Utah State University

2014–2018

Assistant Professor, Department of Instructional Technology and Learning Sciences, Utah State University

2008–2014

Teaching Assistant; Educational Technology Coordinator and Instructor (Secondary Transition to Teaching); Research Assistant; Lecturer (French), Purdue University

2002–2008

Teaching Associate (French), The Ohio State University

1999–2001
Education
Ph.D., Educational Technology
Purdue University (2008)
M.A., French
The Ohio State University (2001)
B.A., French
The College of Wooster (1999)
Biography

Brian R. Belland is a Professor of Education (Educational Psychology) at The Pennsylvania State University. His research examines scaffolding—especially computer-based scaffolding—to support middle and high school students’ argumentation and problem solving, preservice teacher learning (e.g., debugging and computing), and synthesis of scaffolding effects across STEM education via meta-analysis and machine learning. He has received over $1M in NSF funding, including an NSF CAREER Award, and publishes in outlets such as Educational Psychologist, Review of Educational Research, Educational Psychology Review, Contemporary Educational Psychology, Computers & Education, and ETR&D.

Theories & Frameworks
Scaffolding Design Framework for Motivation and Cognition

A conceptual framework that integrates motivational and cognitive supports in the design of computer‑based scaffolds for problem‑centered learning, offering guidelines to enhance engagement (e.g., autonomy, interest) alongside cognitive processes.

Introduced: 2013
Framework for Scaffolding Construction of Evidence‑Based Arguments

A design‑oriented framework specifying scaffold functions to help students generate claims, evaluate and connect evidence, and build coherent arguments during problem‑based science inquiry.

Introduced: 2008
Research Interests
  • Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Computational Thinking
  • Learning Analytics
  • Learning Sciences
  • Meta-analysis
  • Mixed Methods
  • Problem-Based Learning
  • Quantitative Methods
  • STEM
  • Self-Regulated Learning
  • Technology Integration
Peer-reviewed Journal Articles & Top Conference Papers
7

Educational Technology Research and Development • Journal

Brian R. Belland

Early childhood teacher candidates often learn programming through educational robotics and need support to develop debugging competence. Using a mixed-methods design that included lag sequential analysis, ICAP coding, sentiment analysis, and qualitative analysis, this study examined how reliance on prompts shifted as tasks increased in complexity. Candidates engaged more in revision and evaluation than initial exploration and, over time, demonstrated decreased dependence on scaffolding and increased debugging competence. Findings address a gap in the scaffolding literature by tracing evidence of responsibility transfer from scaffolds to learners.

Educational Psychologist • Journal

Brian R. Belland

This conceptual article argues that many inquiry and problem-based environments underemphasize motivation. It synthesizes literatures on scaffolding, problem-based learning, and motivation to propose a design framework for computer-based scaffolds that jointly support motivational and cognitive processes. The framework offers design guidelines to enhance engagement (e.g., interest, autonomy support) alongside cognitive supports for complex tasks, and outlines implications and research directions for integrating motivational constructs into scaffold design.

The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning (IRRODL) • Journal

Brian R. Belland

This study examined the extent to which three types of interaction (learner–instructor, learner–content, learner–learner), Internet self‑efficacy, and self‑regulated learning predict student satisfaction in fully online courses. Using regression analyses, learner–instructor interaction, learner–content interaction, and Internet self‑efficacy significantly predicted satisfaction, with learner–content interaction explaining the most unique variance. Learner–learner interaction and self‑regulated learning did not uniquely predict satisfaction. Implications for course design and online teaching are discussed.

Computers & Education • Journal

Brian R. Belland

Despite increased access to technology in schools, classroom integration remains limited. This paper employs Bourdieu’s theory of habitus to reframe persistent explanations based solely on post-training “barriers.” It argues that teachers’ prior experiences as learners and their professional contexts shape dispositions that influence technology use. The article proposes moving beyond barrier inventories toward approaches that account for habitus-driven practices and suggests implications for teacher education and professional development.

Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem‑Based Learning • Journal

Brian R. Belland

Given claims that PBL improves deep content learning, problem solving, and self‑directed learning, this review examined the instruments used in 33 empirical studies to assess these targets. Few studies articulated theoretical frameworks for the constructs measured or rationales linking assessments to constructs, limiting the validity of inferences. The paper discusses implications and offers recommendations to strengthen assessment practices in PBL research.

Educational Technology Research and Development • Journal

Brian R. Belland

Problem‑based learning often requires students to formulate evidence‑based arguments, yet novices struggle to connect claims and evidence. This article analyzes the components and processes of argumentation and reviews scaffolding models that help students generate claims, gather and evaluate evidence, and link the two. It presents guidelines for the design of computer‑based scaffolds to support middle school students’ construction of evidence‑based arguments during inquiry.

Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication • Journal

Peggy A. Ertmer, Brian R. Belland

This exploratory study investigated whether structured peer feedback could improve the quality of students’ postings in online course discussions. In a large graduate course, students used an automated peer‑rating system within discussion forums. Analyses comparing pre‑course and post‑course postings (using Bloom’s taxonomy) indicated that quality was maintained or improved with peer feedback, even though learners expressed preferences for instructor feedback. Students reported that giving peer feedback reinforced their learning and supported higher‑level understanding.

Other Works
1

Springer (Cham) • Book

Brian R. Belland

This open-access monograph synthesizes research on scaffolding and related interventions in STEM education via meta-analysis. It details theoretical foundations, scaffolding strategies aligned to intended outcomes (e.g., problem solving, argumentation), and examines how study quality, assessment type, and scaffold characteristics (strategy, fading, pairing) influence cognitive outcomes. The book also proposes assessment and research design approaches for evaluating scaffold effects and identifies promising future applications.