Peter Shea

  • Professor of Online Teaching and Learning, University at Albany, State University of New York

scholar.google.com/citations?user=5Q-N_P8AAAAJ

Impact Metrics
15,089
Total Citations
14
PR Journals
50
h-index
62
i10-index
0
Top Conf
1
Other Works
Awards & Honors
Excellence in Education Award

University at Albany, State University of New York

2013
Best Paper Award

EDMedia (AACE)

2011
Fellow, Online Learning Consortium (Sloan‑C Fellow)

Online Learning Consortium

2011
Saratogian 20 Under 40 Award

The Saratogian (newspaper)

2003
Sloan‑C Award for Excellence in Institution‑wide ALN Programming (co‑recipient)

Sloan Consortium (now OLC)

2002
Sloan‑C Award for Excellence in Faculty Development (co‑recipient)

Sloan Consortium (now OLC)

2001
EDUCAUSE Award for Systemic Progress in Teaching and Learning (co‑recipient)

EDUCAUSE

2001
Past Positions

Editor‑in‑Chief, Online Learning Journal, Online Learning Consortium

2005–2008

Visiting Assistant Professor, University at Albany, State University of New York

1999–2004

Manager, State University of New York – Teaching, Learning, and Technology Program

1999–2001

Lead Multimedia Instructional Designer, SUNY Learning Network

1998–2000

Director, SUNY Learning Network

1997–1998

Associate Provost for Online Learning, University at Albany, State University of New York

1993–1996
Education
Ph.D., Curriculum and Instruction
University at Albany, State University of New York (1998)
M.S., Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL)
University at Albany, State University of New York (1992)
B.A., Political Science
State University of New York College at Purchase (1985)
Biography

Peter Shea is a Professor in the Department of Educational Theory & Practice at the University at Albany, State University of New York, with a joint appointment in Informatics. His research centers on technology‑mediated teaching and learning in higher education, especially online and blended learning, the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework, and learner self‑regulation (“learning presence”). He previously served as UAlbany’s Associate Provost for Online Learning and as Director of the SUNY Learning Network. He has authored widely cited journal articles and book chapters on online learning, received national recognition from EDUCAUSE and the Sloan/Online Learning Consortium, and has led externally funded projects from the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation and the U.S. Department of Education.

Theories & Frameworks
Learning Presence (extension to the Community of Inquiry framework)

An added element of the Community of Inquiry model that emphasizes learners’ self‑regulatory processes—forethought/planning, monitoring/adapting strategies, and reflection—influencing and influenced by teaching and social presence to enable meaningful cognitive presence in online/blended settings.

Introduced: 2010
Research Interests
  • Assessment
  • Blended Learning
  • Higher Education
  • Learning Communities
  • Self-Regulated Learning
  • Teacher Education
Peer-reviewed Journal Articles & Top Conference Papers
14

Computers & Education • Journal

Peter Shea

Using the U.S. Beginning Postsecondary Students survey (BPS 04/09), the study tests whether early enrollment in online courses harms credential attainment for community‑college students. Controlling for background characteristics, students who took some early online coursework were more likely to earn a credential than peers taking only classroom courses, challenging assumptions that online learning necessarily impedes completion.

DOI 394 citations

International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning (IRRODL) • Journal

Peter Shea

Combines quantitative content analysis with social network analysis in a graduate blended course to detect forms of learning presence (forethought, monitoring, adaptation, reflection). Students demonstrating stronger self‑ and co‑regulation occupied more central network positions and produced higher‑quality knowledge artifacts, reinforcing the theoretical and practical value of learning presence.

DOI 158 citations

The Internet and Higher Education • Journal

Peter Shea, Anthony G. Picciano, Karen Swan

Summarizes three national surveys of district/high‑school leaders conducted by the Babson Survey Research Group. Reviews the scale, forms (fully online, blended, supplemental), and purposes of K–12 online learning and discusses implications for policy and high‑school reform, situating K–12 developments in the broader trajectory of online education.

DOI 388 citations

Computers & Education • Journal

Peter Shea

Investigates whether learning presence (online self‑regulation) moderates relationships among teaching, social, and cognitive presence. Findings suggest that learning presence strengthens the predictive links between presences and outcomes, indicating that students’ regulation skills are key to realizing the benefits of well‑designed online environments.

DOI 358 citations

The Internet and Higher Education • Journal

Peter Shea

Extends prior work on learning presence by analyzing online discourse and course artifacts to detect self‑, co‑, and socially‑shared regulation in online courses. Evidence shows learning presence emerges more strongly in complex, collaborative activities and correlates with course performance, supporting its inclusion as an element of the CoI framework.

DOI 355 citations

Educational Media International • Journal

Peter Shea

Links inputs (teaching/social/cognitive presence) to outputs (quality of student work) by coding online discussions with CoI and evaluating case‑study artifacts using the SOLO taxonomy. Teaching and cognitive presence, together with SOLO scores, account for substantial variance in instructor‑assigned grades, illustrating a process‑product approach to evaluating online learning.

DOI 60 citations

International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning (IRRODL) • Journal

Peter Shea

Critiques common research practices that count only discussion‑forum activity as instruction. By mapping teaching‑presence behaviors across whole courses, the study shows that substantial instructor work occurs outside threaded discussions (design, feedback, assessment), and argues for broader measures to represent online instructional effort.

DOI 296 citations

The Internet and Higher Education • Journal

Peter Shea

Analyzes two fully online courses using quantitative content analysis and social network analysis to explore relationships among teaching, social, and cognitive presence. Results reveal complex interactions between instructor and student presences and patterns of participation associated with higher‑order inquiry, offering methodological and practical insights for advancing CoI research and practice.

DOI 478 citations

Computers & Education • Journal

Peter Shea

Proposes and tests an extension to the Community of Inquiry framework by foregrounding students’ active roles as self‑regulated learners. Using survey data from 3,165 students in online and hybrid courses across 42 institutions, the study links learner self‑efficacy and regulation to perceived quality of learning and to teaching and social presence. The authors introduce “learning presence” to capture cognitive, motivational, and behavioral processes that support self‑regulation in technology‑mediated settings and argue that incorporating this element strengthens CoI’s explanatory power for online/blended learning.

DOI 1,310 citations

Computers & Education • Journal

Peter Shea

Validates a survey instrument for teaching, social, and cognitive presence with 2,159 online learners and uses structural equation modeling to show that teaching and social presence explain a large portion of variance in cognitive presence, a proxy for meaningful learning. Results underscore the importance of instructor orchestration and social climate in promoting higher‑order inquiry online.

DOI 1,022 citations

Online Learning (formerly JALN) • Journal

Peter Shea

Discusses theoretical assumptions behind learner‑centered online pedagogy and reports a study of 2,314 students across 32 campuses. Perceptions of directed facilitation and clear design/organization by instructors predict stronger feelings of shared purpose, trust, connectedness, and learning—core attributes of learning community.

DOI 529 citations

The Internet and Higher Education • Journal

Peter Shea

Examines whether online instructors’ teaching presence predicts students’ sense of learning community. In a multi‑institutional sample (n=1,067; 32 colleges), validated scales showed that instructional design/organization and directed facilitation are strongly associated with students’ connectedness and perceived learning. Demographic factors (e.g., age, gender) did not meaningfully alter these relationships. Implications include designing for clarity, facilitation, and feedback to cultivate robust online communities.

DOI 1,184 citations

Online Learning (formerly JALN) • Journal

Peter Shea, Karen Swan

Presents a multi‑institutional study (n=2,036) linking teaching‑presence behaviors to students’ sense of online learning community. Effective instructional design/organization and directed facilitation by instructors are significant predictors of connectedness and perceived learning, supporting design strategies that foreground presence to build community.

DOI 571 citations

Online Learning (formerly JALN) • Journal

Peter Shea

Extends earlier SUNY Learning Network research by surveying over 6,000 enrollments. High levels of instructional design/organization, facilitation, and direct instruction correlate with greater student satisfaction and reported learning, highlighting faculty development and course design practices that enhance teaching presence.

DOI 555 citations
Other Works
1

• Journal

Starr Roxanne Hiltz, Peter Shea

This pilot study used structured focus groups with experienced online faculty at two universities to identify motivators and demotivators for teaching in Asynchronous Learning Networks (ALN). Rank‑ordered results were highly consistent across groups, illustrating key incentives, barriers, and contextual experiences that shape faculty engagement with online teaching. The paper also reflects on the suitability of focus groups for this type of inquiry.